ABSTRACT
The increasing complexity of scientific problems related to lifestyle risk factors has prompted substantial investments in transdisciplinary or team science initiatives at the biological, psychosocial, and population levels of analysis. To date, the actual process of conducting team science from the perspectives of investigators engaged in it has not been well documented. We describe the experience of developing and implementing data collection protocols using the principles of transdisciplinary science. The New England Family Study Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center was a 10-year collaboration involving more than 85 investigators and consultants from more than 20 disciplines as well as more than 50 research staff. We used a two-phase process in which all the study personnel participated in the developing and testing of 160 instruments. These instruments were used in 4,378 assessments with 3,501 participants. With substantial effort, it is possible to build a team of scientists from diverse backgrounds that can develop a set of instruments using a shared conceptual approach, despite limited or no experience working together previously.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 35(11):1343-1357.
Turkkan JS, Kaufman NJ, Rimer BK. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers: a model collaboration between public and private sectors. Nic Tob Res. 2000; 2(1):9-13.
Stokols D, Fuqua J, Gress J, et al. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S21-S39.
Thompson Klein JT. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press; 1996.
Abrams DB. Transdisciplinary paradigms for tobacco prevention research. Nic Tob Res. 1999; 1(Suppl 1):S15-S23.
Hall KL, Stokols D, Stipelman BA, et al. Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):157-163.
Mabry PL, Olster DH, Morgan GD, Abrams DB. Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S211-S224.
Abrams DB, Leslie F, Mermelstein R, Kobus K, Clayton RR. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S5-S10.
Baker TB, Cummings KM, Hatsukami DK, et al. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers: research achievements and future implications. Nic Tob Res. 2009; 11(10):1231-1244.
Morgan GD, Kobus K, Gerlach KK, et al. Facilitating transdisciplinary research: the experience of the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S11-S19.
Masse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, et al. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S151-S160.
Hall KL, Stokols D, Moser RP, et al. The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One Evaluation Study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S161-S172.
Kobus K, Mermelstein R, Ponkshe P. Communications strategies to broaden the reach of tobacco use research: examples from the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nic Tob Res. 2007; 9(Suppl 4):S571-S582.
Stokols D, Misra S, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S96-S115.
Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S116-S123.
Rimer BK, Abrams DB. Present and future horizons for transdisciplinary research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):200-201.
Broman S, Bien E, Shaughnessy P. Low Achieving Children: The First Seven Years. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum; 1985.
Buka SL, Lipsitt LP, Tsuang MT. Birth complications and psychological deviancy: a 25-year prospective inquiry. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1988; 30(5):537-546.
Nichols P, Chen T. Minimal Brain Dysfunction: A Prospective Study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum; 1981.
Klebanoff MA, Zemel BS, Buka S, Zierler S. Long-term follow-up of participants in the Collaborative Perinatal Project: tracking the next generation. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998; 12(3):334-346.
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991; 86(9):1119-1127.
Robins L, Wing J, Wittchen H, et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988; 45:1069-1077.
Piper ME, Piasecki TM, Federman EB, et al. A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(2):139-154.
Shiffman S, Waters A, Hickcox M. The Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale: a multidimensional measure of nicotine dependence. Nic Tob Res. 2004; 6(2):327-348.
Colby SM, Clark MA, Rogers ML, et al. Development and reliability of the lifetime interview on smoking trajectories. Nic Tob Res. 2012; 14(3):290-298.
Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS, Namenek RJ. Early experiences with tobacco among women smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers. Addiction. 1998; 93(4):595-599.
Shenassa ED, McCaffery JM, Swan GE, et al. Intergenerational transmission of tobacco use and dependence: a transdisciplinary perspective. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S55-S69.
Kahler CW, Strong DR, Papandonatos GD, et al. Cigarette smoking and the lifetime alcohol involvement continuum. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 93(1–2):111-120.
Boergers J, Clark M, Colby S, et al. Effects of Audiotaping on Adolescents’ Self-Reports of Tobacco and Substance Use. Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Orlando, FL; 2006.
Gilman SE, Rende R, Boergers J, et al. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: an intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):e274-e281.
Kahler CW, Daughters SB, Leventhal AM, et al. Personality, psychiatric disorders, and smoking in middle-aged adults. Nic Tob Res. 2009; 11(7):833-841.
Kahler CW, Leventhal AM, Daughters SB, et al. Relationships of personality and psychiatric disorders to multiple domains of smoking motives and dependence in middle-aged adults. Nic Tob Res. 2010; 12(4):381-389.
Dierker LC, Donny E, Tiffany S, Colby SM, Perrine N, Clayton RR. The association between cigarette smoking and DSM-IV nicotine dependence among first year college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 86(2–3):106-114.
Strong DR, Kahler CW, Colby SM, Griesler PC, Kandel D. Linking measures of adolescent nicotine dependence to a common latent continuum. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 99(1–3):296-308.
Kahn R, Prager D. Interdisciplinary collaboration are a scientific and social imperative. Scientist. 1994; 8:12.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute Center Grant P50 CA84719, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Implications
Practice: Data collection instruments developed by The New England Family Study Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center measure nicotine dependence and other psychiatric diagnoses while also providing symptom counts that capture the lower ranges of psychopathology severity.
Research: When evaluating transdisciplinary research, the challenges and opportunities of team science should be documented from investigators’ perspectives along with the number, type, and authorship of the manuscripts produced.
Policy: The funding mechanisms for transdisciplinary team science must be structured such that sufficient time and resources are awarded for investigators to transcend their respective disciplines to develop and implement data collection protocols using a shared conceptual approach.
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, M.A., Rogers, M.L., Boergers, J. et al. A transdisciplinary approach to protocol development for tobacco control research: a case study. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 2, 431–440 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0164-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0164-1